Here comes the sun, and I say
It's all right
It's all right
–––The
Beatles
Did I mention how much sun shines
on our land? Before we lived here I
don’t think I was ever so aware of sunlight unless I was at the beach. I open the front door at, say 2 in the
afternoon on a bright June day, and wham!
I’ve got to reach for my sunglasses just to see. (Remember
the Seinfeld episode when Kramer’s apartment was blasted by the hellish beam of
the neon sign from the chicken restaurant?* It’s like that. Almost.) We face directly west, our back to the east where the slopes
rise to Buck Mountain, delaying our morning light noticeably in the winter but
not a whit this time of year, woods on the north side, and nothing whatever to
impede the sun from the south. Energy, wild, unharnessed.
Well, now it’s harnessed, at least modestly.
In Vermont, in our field, a big dig begins; making holes for the sona tubes that will hold solar panels |
I guess we were solar-ready in a
way. In Masssachusetts, where
we lived until 2010, there was a fleeting period of energy-consciousness in
the early 1980’s––most likely emanating from the time of the Carter
administration and latent memories of the gas crisis of the 1970’s––when sizeable
rebates were available to anyone who installed solar panels. We had two panels to heat water placed
on the roof of the more-or-less south-facing garage of our house in Lexington. (We’re talking about solar water
heating. Photovoltaics were out of
the question; they were too expensive and far less efficient than they are
today.) On brilliant sunny days I
liked thinking that the water we showered in was heated by the sun. But we never got a clear picture of the
energy we saved. The temperature
dial on the solar tank fizzled after a couple of years. We tended to forget what the reading
were supposed to mean anyway. Only a
slight gurgling noise from the tank suggested our water was actually getting
sun-warmed. Over time the trees
around the back yard grew larger, and before long the panels were in a veritable
hole of sunshine. When the possibility
of replacing the solar water tank loomed for the second time, we had the panels
removed.
Our first solar romance was
over.
There were never very many solar
installations in Lexington. A
handful, maybe. A few I’d noticed
in the 1980’s and 90’s had, like ours, tended to disappear by 2000. But then I never thought to see much in
the way of solar panels on homes in any state in the Northeast. (Boston
averages about 200 days of sunshine per year. That sounds optimistic, but it’s a fact. Really.) In 2008 we happened to be driving around Las Vegas, a city
with nearly 300 days of sunshine a year (292, counting partial), and got lost in
a suburban landscape of endless spanking new housing communities, raw and still
mostly unoccupied. (A condition
in which they would remain, given the recession just around the corner.) Not a single roof bore solar
panels. Not one. I’m sure there must have been housing
elsewhere with solar panels that we happened not to see, but you would expect
solar to be a no-brainer anywhere in the state of Nevada. The thing is, there are few incentives
for homeowners in that state. According to a site tracking solar progress in Nevada http://solarpowerrocks.com/nevada/ incentives are "geared toward industrial size installations for businesses or power companies with eyes on creating horizons of silicon in the desert."A small Nevada town whose name I forgot, where the sun shines without hitting a panel |
Here in Vermont we
have half that average number of days with sunshine (a mere 159, counting partial), yet we live
five miles from a solar array, and other solar is not terribly hard to find. There is a move to get more homeowners onto solar,
concentrating for the moment on our county.
Suncommon is the Vermont agent for SunPower |
During the winter we read in our
local paper about a new concept to encourage people in this area to go
solar. Leasing. Sure, if you want to spend some $20,000
or so you can buy a solar system and never pay another penny for
electricity. On the face of it, if
your electrical costs were, say, $1,500 a year, you would break even in well under
twenty years. If you lease, you
don’t own the system, and you continue to pay your $l,500 or so for
electricity. Still, why bother?
The sona tube goes down about 6 feet and will be filled with concrete. This is necessary as the panels will be like sails in the wind. |
The trench from panel 3 brings the power to the electrical panel in the basement. (Where did all those rocks come from? All the soil is pure clay.) |
One reason, of course is that it feels like the right thing
to do. We are helping in a small
way to save energy. But that’s not
really enough. There is a
sweetener. Whether you own or
lease, if your system produces more kilowatt hours than you use, our electric
company, Green Mountain Power, will buy back the electricity at a “guaranteed fixed
rate” of $0.20 per kilowatt hour, $0.21 by year four. (Our most recent bill from Green Mountain Power charged us
only $0.147 per kilowatt hour.) The three panels installed in our sunny
meadow are set to produce a “guaranteed range of annual production” of 14,704
to 16,252 kilowatt hours in year one.
Our actual electricity usage in 2012 was 9,388 kilowatt hours, in 2011
roughly the same. Assuming we continue
to use power at the same pace, we should be able to claim a rebate from Green
Mountain Power for the difference between 9,000-plus kilowatt hours and somewhere
between 14,000 and 16,000 kilowatt hours.
Because our system was more expensive to install than a roof system (our
roof faces east-west), and we have three panels rather than the two that may
have sufficed to cover our current electrical needs, we will have a higher
monthly electrical bill (aka lease
payment) before figuring in rebates for over-generation of power. Will we come out ahead, or behind?
The panels are fitted into the frames |
The inner workings on post #3 |
Electrical connections are made |
A robin has already laid two eggs in a niche on post #3 |
After twenty years the kilowatt hours our system will
produce is projected to decrease to a range of 14,021 to 15,497. All solar panels lose power over time,
but we noted that manufacturing defects in the industry have recently come to
light. According to a May 28, 2013
New York Times article:
Most of the problems,
according to the Times, were with panels made in China, the largest
manufacturer of solar panels, but some American-made panels were defective as
well. Our panels (we asked) are among those manufactured in the US. One of the installers commented they were "really good" panels. In any case, we don’t own them.
Our system is not
officially operational; it awaits an exchange of paperwork and stamps of approval that signify we
have a functioning system. Suncommon, the company that makes
presentations about solar power and installed our system, serves as the Vermont
agent for SunPower, the company based in California that actually owns our panels.
We have no responsibility for upkeep (if there is any) or anything else for
that matter. (Except that it falls upon us to ask the power company for
the rebate.) A computer site will monitor the energy our system is
producing. So far the system was “on” only for limited testing
purposes. It was 4 o’clock in the afternoon, the sun was still high in
the sky, and it was producing energy. No fuzzy picture this time.
Those few minutes (was it a half hour?) of production, according to
our monitoring site, gave the equivalent of “not driving 16 miles in a
standard car.” Wham!
*This
was "The Chicken Roaster"
episode, the 142nd episode of the sitcom Seinfeld, the eighth
episode of the eighth season. It aired on November 14, 1996. You can look it up.
Just curious, Why oversizing so much. I am going through suncommon also and with my research it seems oversizing does not pay off with the credit structure. Maby I was misinformed or missing something cause I was thinking the way you are, make more power,get more credits.
ReplyDeleteJust wondering
You may be right. We wavered. Three were recommended originally by Suncommon, then we thought maybe we'd just get two, although our usage would likely have been closer to total production. How good or bad that would be is a little uncertain. If, however, there were a larger family living here (there are only two of us) usage would be higher, so there was that consideration. Even with two panels, we had to have a trench dug to the electrical panel and this upped the installation. Bottom line... time will tell.
Delete